Wheat Husk Burning in India: An Environmental Crisis During Harvest Season
As India enters the wheat harvesting season, vast stretches
of farmland in Punjab, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, and Rajasthan are once again
engulfed in thick smoke. The practice of burning wheat husk (straw)
post-harvest has become a major environmental and public health disaster.
Despite bans and awareness campaigns, the rate of stubble burning continues to
rise, choking cities, degrading soil, and accelerating climate change.
Why Is Wheat Husk Burning Increasing?
✔ Quick & cheap disposal – Manual removal is labor-intensive and expensive. Cutting, collecting, and transporting wheat straw requires significant manpower.
✔ Preparation for next crop –
Burning clears fields faster for the next sowing cycle. Hiring laborers for
straw management can cost ₹5,000–₹7,000 per acre, making it
unaffordable for small farmers. Unlike burning, which clears a field in
hours, manual removal takes 3-4 days per acre, delaying the next
crop cycle. After wheat harvest, farmers have just 10-15
days to prepare fields for rice (Kharif season). Burning is the
fastest way to clear residue. Without burning, leftover straw can interfere
with seed sowing machines, leading to poor germination.
✔ Lack of affordable
alternatives – Many small farmers lack access to machinery like Happy
Seeders or balers. Increase subsidies under the Crop Residue Management
(CRM) scheme so more farmers can own or rent machines.
The Alarming Adverse Effects of Wheat Husk Burning
Toxic Air Pollution – A Silent Killer
π₯ Delhi-NCR’s Airpocalypse: Post-harvest, stubble burning contributes to 40-50% of Delhi’s PM2.5 levels (SAFAR, 2023). These pollutants travel hundreds of kilometers via wind, merging with Delhi’s existing vehicular and industrial pollution to form a lethal smog cocktail.
π₯ Health Catastrophe:
Respiratory diseases spike by 30-40% in North India during burning season (WHO). 1.67 million deaths in India in 2019 were linked to air pollution (Lancet Study).
π₯ Black Carbon Surge: Wheat burning releases black carbon, which is 10x more heat-trapping than CO₂.
Soil Death – Burning the Future of Farming
Climate Change Accelerator
π CO₂ Emissions: Burning 1 ton of wheat straw releases 1.5 tons of CO₂ (ICAR). The combustion of wheat straw represents a significant climate threat, with each ton burned emitting 1.5 tons of CO₂ (ICAR data). This agricultural practice contributes substantially to India's greenhouse gas emissions, particularly during peak harvesting seasons. When scaled across millions of hectares, these emissions rival those from industrial sectors. The released CO₂ remains atmospheric for centuries, exacerbating global warming. Furthermore, the simultaneous release of black carbon creates dual warming effects - through both greenhouse gas accumulation and solar radiation absorption. This unsustainable practice undermines India's climate commitments while offering no agricultural benefit, making transition to alternative residue management methods both an environmental imperative and climate mitigation opportunity.
Wildlife & Biodiversity Loss
π¦ Habitat Destruction: Birds, insects, and small animals lose nesting grounds. The reckless burning of wheat husk triggers an ecological catastrophe, annihilating critical habitats for countless species. Flames instantly incinerate ground-nesting birds like quails and lapwings, while smoke suffocates beneficial insects - including pollinators vital for crops. Small mammals like hedgehogs and field mice perish in these artificial wildfires, disrupting local food chains. The destruction extends beyond immediate deaths: burnt fields lose 70% of earthworms and soil microbes, crippling natural soil regeneration. Migratory birds avoid these barren wastelands, while predatory species starve without prey. Each burning season pushes vulnerable species closer to extinction, making this not just an agricultural issue, but a full-scale biodiversity emergency demanding urgent action.
π Pollinator
Decline: Bees and butterflies suffer, affecting crop pollination.
Contribution to Climate Change
The burning of agricultural residue releases large amounts
of CO₂ and black carbon, accelerating global warming. Black carbon, in
particular, absorbs sunlight and increases atmospheric temperature. Contribution
to Climate Change. The burning of wheat husk significantly worsens climate
change by releasing massive amounts of carbon dioxide (CO₂) and black carbon
into the atmosphere. Each ton of burned straw emits approximately 1.5 tons of
CO₂, directly contributing to the greenhouse effect. Even more alarming is the
release of black carbon—a fine particulate matter that is 10 times more
heat-trapping than CO₂ in the short term. Unlike CO₂, which lingers for
centuries, black carbon settles on ice and snow, reducing Earth’s albedo
(reflectivity) and accelerating glacial melt. This not only raises global
temperatures but also disrupts monsoon patterns, worsening droughts and
unseasonal rains. Additionally, wheat residue burning emits methane and nitrous
oxide—potent greenhouse gases with 300 times more warming potential than CO₂.
Combined with Delhi-NCR’s existing pollution, these emissions create a deadly
feedback loop, intensifying heatwaves and smog. If unchecked, this practice
will continue to fuel extreme weather, crop failures, and health crises, making
climate action in agriculture an urgent necessity. Sustainable alternatives
like composting, biofuel production, and in-situ decomposition must replace
burning to mitigate this environmental disaster.
Sustainable Alternatives to Burning Wheat Husk
Instead of burning, farmers can adopt eco-friendly methods:
Mulching – Wheat husk can be used as mulch to retain soil moisture and improve fertility. Instead of burning, wheat husk can be transformed into nutrient-rich mulch that benefits both soil and crops. When spread over fields, this organic layer acts as a protective blanket - retaining up to 30% more soil moisture, suppressing weeds naturally, and regulating soil temperature. As the husk gradually decomposes, it releases valuable nutrients back into the earth, improving fertility without chemical inputs. Studies show mulched fields require 20% less irrigation and demonstrate enhanced microbial activity. This simple, cost-effective practice not only prevents air pollution but also boosts crop yields by 15-20% over time, making it a win-win solution for farmers and the environment alike.
Composting – Converting straw into organic compost enriches the soil. Instead of burning, wheat straw can be composted into nutrient-dense organic fertilizer through simple decomposition. When mixed with cattle manure and microbial inoculants, the straw breaks down into humus-rich compost packed with nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium - nature's perfect soil amendment. This process not only eliminates air pollution but creates a valuable input that:
Adopted across 800,000+ acres in Punjab and Haryana, Happy Seeder technology boosts yields by 10-15% compared to burning fields. With 80% subsidy support under CRM schemes, it's becoming an affordable, scalable solution that protects both farmer livelihoods and the environment - turning agricultural waste into a valuable soil nutrient resource.
Government Policies and Awareness
Many governments have introduced bans on stubble burning and
promote alternatives through subsidies and awareness programs. Farmers need
access to affordable machinery and training to adopt sustainable practices. While
state governments have implemented strict bans on stubble burning with
penalties up to ₹15,000 per violation, enforcement alone cannot solve this
complex issue. Recognizing this, policymakers have introduced several
supportive measures:
- Subsidy
Schemes
- The
Central Government's ₹1,400 crore Crop Residue Management (CRM)
Scheme provides 50-80% subsidies on agricultural machinery like
Happy Seeders, Super SMS attachments, and bailers.
- Punjab
alone has distributed over 24,000 residue management machines since 2018.
- Alternative
Markets Creation
- Initiatives
like the "Punjab Biomass Power" project purchase straw at
₹1,100/ton for bioenergy production.
- NTPC's
co-firing policy mandates 10% biomass pellets in thermal plants, creating
demand for 20 million tons/year.
- Training
& Awareness
- Krishi
Vigyan Kendras conduct 5,000+ annual training sessions on in-situ
decomposition techniques.
- Successful
models like Haryana's "Meri Fasal Mera Byora" portal link
400,000 farmers to straw procurement centers.
However, challenges persist:
- Last-mile
gaps in machinery access for small farmers (<2 hectares)
- Delayed
subsidy disbursements discouraging adoption
- Lack
of custom hiring centers in remote villages
The solution lies in combining strict enforcement
with robust support systems - ensuring affordable technology access,
timely payments for straw, and continued education about long-term soil health
benefits. Only through this balanced approach can we break the burning cycle
permanently.
Conclusion
Burning wheat husk may seem convenient, but its long-term
environmental and health impacts are devastating. By adopting sustainable
alternatives, farmers can protect the environment, improve soil health, and
reduce air pollution. Collective efforts from governments, NGOs, and farming
communities are essential to phase out this harmful practice.
Call to Action
If you’re a farmer or know someone involved in agriculture,
explore eco-friendly ways to manage crop residue. Share this blog to spread
awareness about the dangers of wheat husk burning!
Comments
Post a Comment